Planet Earth: Episode V – Invasion of The Kardashians
Shortly, we will all know just a lil’ too much about Ms. Kardashian and rapper Ray J. On February 28th Vivid Pictures will premiere the explicit sex tape of hanger-on and Hollywood Socialite Kim Kardashian getting fucked by the one-time-but-now-ex Whitney Houston boyfriend. What makes this million dollar spectacle what it is and what separates it from the spate of other celebrity sex tapes that have wormed their way through the Internet is the massive hype that’s surrounding this particular romp in the hay. In sexcapades past all parties – it is assumed – had no idea, certainly no sense of preparedness, that the tapes would make it into wider circulation. But here you have a sale that Ms. Kardashian – aside from a lot of faux hemming and hawing about the inhumanity of it all – seems in a single gesture to have lowered the bar for achieving immediate, albeit fleeting celebrity status. In the old days it was bearing you soul on Daytime Talk. With a new medium and whole new concept of ‘content,’ baring your soul is the bare minimum for making a name for yourself. So guys if the blog circuit isn’t cutting for you, there’s a Brave New World. Just remember: nobody likes unkept pubes.

--MOC BLOGGER

--MOC BLOGGER

3 Comments:
I could really say that I am not interested in naked women...much more in seeing women getting fucked and seeing this here kinda mkaes me lose interest.
I just heard on E! that Kim Kardashian filed a lawsuit against Vivid to stop them from selling the tape. I know my opinion doesn't mean much, but I hope she wins. Clearly, she does not want this sex tape to be distributed. She's the star of it, so shouldn't her say count for something? According to Kim, this was not meant for the public and I really feel bad for her that it was leaked. Sure, one could argue that she shouldn't have made the tape in the first place and she wouldn't be in this mess. But who the hell are we to say what a person should or should not do in the privacy of their own home. What I feel for Vivid is disgust. But why should I be surprised that a company could actually care more about dead presidents than respect.
Vivid has been around for a long time so it would be difficult to believe that Vivid would not have the legal right to distribute Kim Kardashian's video. I would presume that both parties signed an agreement that probably included money, in order for the video to be distributed.
This posting is another example of hypocrisy...I looked at all the links associated with this post, even got to Kim's blog. Just from the various pictures Kim has posted, I'd say, she pretty much knew what she was getting into... and perhaps, she got cold feet--going from a very wanton image into porn is probably a very short step. At the end of the day, it takes a LOT OF MONEY to maintain a "princess" lifestyle.
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home